<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dear Mister Jones &#187; Wordy Wally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/category/wordy-wally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Here&#039;s 2 cents, don&#039;t spend it all at once</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The sound of &#8216;ee&#8217; in &#8216;people&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Poeple&#8217; is just a weird word.  Not for what it means but for how it&#8217;s spelled.  It is the only word in the entire English language that makes the &#8216;ee&#8217; sound using the letters &#8216;eo&#8217;.  No wonder people think English is a hard language to learn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Poeple&#8217; is just a weird word.  Not for what it means but for how it&#8217;s spelled.  It is the only word in the entire English language that makes the &#8216;ee&#8217; sound <a href="http://www.englishspellingproblems.co.uk/html/ee_sound.html" title="Words with the ee sound" target="_blank">using the letters &#8216;eo&#8217;</a>.  No wonder people think English is a hard language to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sound of &#8216;ee&#8217; in &#8216;people&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Poeple&#8217; is just a weird word.  Not for what it means but for how it&#8217;s spelled.  It is the only word in the entire English language that makes the &#8216;ee&#8217; sound using the letters &#8216;eo&#8217;.  No wonder people think English is a hard language to learn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Poeple&#8217; is just a weird word.  Not for what it means but for how it&#8217;s spelled.  It is the only word in the entire English language that makes the &#8216;ee&#8217; sound <a href="http://www.englishspellingproblems.co.uk/html/ee_sound.html" title="Words with the ee sound" target="_blank">using the letters &#8216;eo&#8217;</a>.  No wonder people think English is a hard language to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/31/the-sound-of-ee-in-people-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should I use a comma before the &#8216;and&#8217; in a series of items?</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally speaking, the answer is yes.  If you ommit the comma, it can lead to ambiguous meanings.  Following is an example. I would like to thank my parents, Sandy and God. In this sentence, is the person thankful for his parents, who are Sandy and God??? Or is he thankful for 4 people, his parents, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally speaking, the answer is yes.  If you ommit the comma, it can lead to ambiguous meanings.  Following is an example.</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank my parents, Sandy and God.</li>
</ul>
<p>In this sentence, is the person thankful for his parents, who are Sandy and God??? Or is he thankful for 4 people, his parents, Sandy, and God?</p>
<p>If you insert the comma before the &#8216;and&#8217; (this comma is called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma" title="serial or Oxford comma" target="_blank">serial or Oxford comma</a>, by the way), then your meaning will be clearer:</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank my parents, Sandy, and God.</li>
</ul>
<p>However, what if you wanted to say the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank my mother, Sandy, and John.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, regardless of whether you use a comma after &#8216;Sandy&#8217; or not, the meaning could still be ambiguous.  Is Sandy the mother or is she a different person?  When confronted with this sort of a list of three or more elements, the trick is to order them in a way that removes any ambiguity.  Or, you can use different punctuation to make the meaning clearer.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at some ways we can reorder this to make our meaning clear:</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank John, my mother, and Sandy. <em>(3 distinct people, assuming John is not your mother&#8217;s name)</em></li>
<li>I would like to thank my mother (Sandy) and John.  <em>(2 distinct people)</em></li>
<li>I would like to thank my mother and Sandy and John.  <em>(3 distinct people)</em></li>
</ul>
<p>When it comes to lists of the x, y, and z fashion &#8211; I always prefer to include the comma before the &#8216;and&#8217;.  However, even that won&#8217;t always remove ambiguity &#8211; so then you must find ways to change the sentence so that your meaning is clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should I use a comma before the &#8216;and&#8217; in a series of items?</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally speaking, the answer is yes.  If you ommit the comma, it can lead to ambiguous meanings.  Following is an example. I would like to thank my parents, Sandy and God. In this sentence, is the person thankful for his parents, who are Sandy and God??? Or is he thankful for 4 people, his parents, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally speaking, the answer is yes.  If you ommit the comma, it can lead to ambiguous meanings.  Following is an example.</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank my parents, Sandy and God.</li>
</ul>
<p>In this sentence, is the person thankful for his parents, who are Sandy and God??? Or is he thankful for 4 people, his parents, Sandy, and God?</p>
<p>If you insert the comma before the &#8216;and&#8217; (this comma is called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma" title="serial or Oxford comma" target="_blank">serial or Oxford comma</a>, by the way), then your meaning will be clearer:</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank my parents, Sandy, and God.</li>
</ul>
<p>However, what if you wanted to say the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank my mother, Sandy, and John.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, regardless of whether you use a comma after &#8216;Sandy&#8217; or not, the meaning could still be ambiguous.  Is Sandy the mother or is she a different person?  When confronted with this sort of a list of three or more elements, the trick is to order them in a way that removes any ambiguity.  Or, you can use different punctuation to make the meaning clearer.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at some ways we can reorder this to make our meaning clear:</p>
<ul>
<li>I would like to thank John, my mother, and Sandy. <em>(3 distinct people, assuming John is not your mother&#8217;s name)</em></li>
<li>I would like to thank my mother (Sandy) and John.  <em>(2 distinct people)</em></li>
<li>I would like to thank my mother and Sandy and John.  <em>(3 distinct people)</em></li>
</ul>
<p>When it comes to lists of the x, y, and z fashion &#8211; I always prefer to include the comma before the &#8216;and&#8217;.  However, even that won&#8217;t always remove ambiguity &#8211; so then you must find ways to change the sentence so that your meaning is clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/12/05/should-i-use-a-comma-before-the-and-in-a-series-of-items-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word o&#8217; the Wise :: Troika</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A troika is a committee or group consisting of three members. I can&#8217;t believe how often I&#8217;ve seen or heard this word in the last couple of years. My favorite use of it, however, was when someone referred to the troika of the three monster-themed breakfast cereals: Count Chocula, Boo Berry, and Franken Berry. Count [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.answers.com/troika" title="troika definition" target="_blank">troika </a>is a committee or group consisting of three members.  I can&#8217;t believe how often I&#8217;ve seen or heard this word in the last couple of years.  My favorite use of it, however, was when someone referred to the troika of the three monster-themed breakfast cereals: Count Chocula, Boo Berry, and Franken Berry.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Chocula" title="Count Chocula" target="_blank">Count Chocula</a> was always my favorite, with Boo Berry coming in a close second.  I never was much of a fan of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franken_Berry" title="Franken Berry - big headed monster" target="_blank">Franken Berry</a>, though.  I don&#8217;t think it really had too much to do with the flavor.  I think as a kid I always thought his head was way too big.  How could anything taste good when it was represented by somebody with such a huge noggin?</p>
<p>My brother informed me recently that they&#8217;ve changed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boo_Berry" title="Boo Berry" target="_blank">Boo Berry</a> somehow and it no longer tastes the same as it did when we were kids.  I don&#8217;t know if I believe him &#8211; I think I&#8217;ll have to go and buy at least 5 boxes just to make sure, and I&#8217;ll probably have to test out Count Chocula as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word o&#8217; the Wise :: Troika</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A troika is a committee or group consisting of three members. I can&#8217;t believe how often I&#8217;ve seen or heard this word in the last couple of years. My favorite use of it, however, was when someone referred to the troika of the three monster-themed breakfast cereals: Count Chocula, Boo Berry, and Franken Berry. Count [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.answers.com/troika" title="troika definition" target="_blank">troika </a>is a committee or group consisting of three members.  I can&#8217;t believe how often I&#8217;ve seen or heard this word in the last couple of years.  My favorite use of it, however, was when someone referred to the troika of the three monster-themed breakfast cereals: Count Chocula, Boo Berry, and Franken Berry.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Chocula" title="Count Chocula" target="_blank">Count Chocula</a> was always my favorite, with Boo Berry coming in a close second.  I never was much of a fan of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franken_Berry" title="Franken Berry - big headed monster" target="_blank">Franken Berry</a>, though.  I don&#8217;t think it really had too much to do with the flavor.  I think as a kid I always thought his head was way too big.  How could anything taste good when it was represented by somebody with such a huge noggin?</p>
<p>My brother informed me recently that they&#8217;ve changed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boo_Berry" title="Boo Berry" target="_blank">Boo Berry</a> somehow and it no longer tastes the same as it did when we were kids.  I don&#8217;t know if I believe him &#8211; I think I&#8217;ll have to go and buy at least 5 boxes just to make sure, and I&#8217;ll probably have to test out Count Chocula as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/26/word-o-the-week-troika-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word o&#8217; the Wise :: Maven does not equal Maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the coolest things about a digital dictionary like m-w.com, is that now when you go and look up a word, you can hear it pronounced correctly instead of having to try to understand their pronunciation guide (which makes me have to look up more words I didn&#8217;t know like umlaut and diacritic). However, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the coolest things about a digital dictionary like <a href="http://www.m-w.com" target="_blank">m-w.com</a>, is that now when you go and look up a word, you can hear it pronounced correctly instead of having to try to understand their pronunciation guide (which makes me have to look up more words I didn&#8217;t know like <a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/umlaut" title="two dots above a letter" target="_blank">umlaut </a>and <a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/diacritic" title="characters used to show how to pronounce words" target="_blank">diacritic</a>).  However, it&#8217;s a little disappointing to look up the meaning of a word you&#8217;ve actually used in conversation in the past, and find out that you&#8217;ve been mispronouncing it the whole time.  I kinda knew what a &#8216;<a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/maven" title="Meaning of the word maven" target="_blank">maven</a>&#8216; was &#8211; it was someone who was cool because he/she knew a lot about something.  But I think I must have somehow associated it with being a &#8216;Maverick&#8217; (it&#8217;s probably lame that I even still think <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=B000RZIGZ4%26tag=demrjo-20%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/B000RZIGZ4%253FSubscriptionId=1N9AHEAQ2F6SVD97BE02" title="Top Gun - Highway to the Danger Zone" set="yes" linkindex="75" target="_blank">Top Gun </a>was cool), because I have always pronounced it &#8216;mavin&#8217; (with the &#8216;a&#8217; sounding like the a in &#8216;nag&#8217;) instead of &#8216;<a href="http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?maven001.wav=maven" title="Correct pronunciation of maven" target="_blank">mayven</a>&#8216;.</p>
<p>Now that I know how it&#8217;s actually pronounced, it&#8217;s lost a lot of its coolness factor for me. If I am referred to as a maven now I&#8217;ll associate it with being a maynard or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word o&#8217; the Wise :: Maven does not equal Maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mister jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordy Wally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearmisterjones.com/index.php/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the coolest things about a digital dictionary like m-w.com, is that now when you go and look up a word, you can hear it pronounced correctly instead of having to try to understand their pronunciation guide (which makes me have to look up more words I didn&#8217;t know like umlaut and diacritic). However, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the coolest things about a digital dictionary like <a href="http://www.m-w.com" target="_blank">m-w.com</a>, is that now when you go and look up a word, you can hear it pronounced correctly instead of having to try to understand their pronunciation guide (which makes me have to look up more words I didn&#8217;t know like <a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/umlaut" title="two dots above a letter" target="_blank">umlaut </a>and <a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/diacritic" title="characters used to show how to pronounce words" target="_blank">diacritic</a>).  However, it&#8217;s a little disappointing to look up the meaning of a word you&#8217;ve actually used in conversation in the past, and find out that you&#8217;ve been mispronouncing it the whole time.  I kinda knew what a &#8216;<a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/maven" title="Meaning of the word maven" target="_blank">maven</a>&#8216; was &#8211; it was someone who was cool because he/she knew a lot about something.  But I think I must have somehow associated it with being a &#8216;Maverick&#8217; (it&#8217;s probably lame that I even still think <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=B000RZIGZ4%26tag=demrjo-20%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/B000RZIGZ4%253FSubscriptionId=1N9AHEAQ2F6SVD97BE02" title="Top Gun - Highway to the Danger Zone" set="yes" linkindex="75" target="_blank">Top Gun </a>was cool), because I have always pronounced it &#8216;mavin&#8217; (with the &#8216;a&#8217; sounding like the a in &#8216;nag&#8217;) instead of &#8216;<a href="http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?maven001.wav=maven" title="Correct pronunciation of maven" target="_blank">mayven</a>&#8216;.</p>
<p>Now that I know how it&#8217;s actually pronounced, it&#8217;s lost a lot of its coolness factor for me. If I am referred to as a maven now I&#8217;ll associate it with being a maynard or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dearmisterjones.com/wordpress/2007/11/19/word-o-the-week-maven-does-not-equal-maverick-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

